Thursday, December 19, 2013

The comparison of art

The Byzantine Empire depicts their religion through their art better than the Islamic culture. The artwork from the Byzantine Empire were more focused on religion than the Islam’s art. The Islamic culture had more of a spiritual representation and the Byzantine had a more physical representation of their faith. I saw this in pictures of their artwork during that time. In this blog I will be comparing the Byzantine Empire and Islamic culture about how their artwork related to their religion. I believe that the Byzantine Empire’s artwork had more to do with religion than Islam’s.


The Byzantine Empire was more focused on religion in their art compared to the Islamic Culture. The Cambrai Madonna is one example. In this picture Mary is holding Jesus as a baby. The painting during the Byzantine times were mostly religion


The Islamic Culture were not as focused in religion in their artwork. They couldn’t draw figures because it was against their religion. In the islamic religion, you couldn’t draw figures because it was idolizing someone other than Allah. It was also against their law to draw Allah. The reason why it was against their law is because they did not want to dishonor their god. Instead of drawing figures, Islamic people drew patterns.


Byzantine Empire Art-
  • focused on religion
  • The Cambrai Madonna is a painting of Mary and Jesus
Islamic Culture Art-
  • against law to draw figures and Allah
  • drew patterns

Byzantine Art- The Cambrai Madonna





Islamic Art-







-BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web. 16 Dec. 2013.
-"Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History." Byzantium (ca. 330–1453). N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
-"Byzantine Iconoclasm." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 19 Dec. 2013. Web. 19 Dec. 2013.
-"Late Roman and Early Byzantine Treasures from the British Museum." The Art Institute of Chicago. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Dec. 2013.
-"Cambrai Madonna." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 12 May 2013. Web. 19 Dec. 2013.






Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Comparison of clothing


Comparison of clothing


In the blog, I will be contrasting clothing from the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic civilization. The fashion was part of the Byzantine’s everyday life as  well as it was in the Muslims everyday life. While most of their clothes looked relatively different, there were other things that made the fashion alike in each place.



My primary source for clothing from the Byzantine Empire was this picture of a Byzantine man. As you can see, he is wearing many layers. The first layer they would wear a tunica talaris usually made of silk. Covering this would be a smaller dalmatic made out of gold brocade. Over that would be a toga made of silk. Each layer would have very detailed designs on it. The layers basically made the outfit look as beautiful as it does. The shoes that he is wearing would be sandals made of soft leather sandals.



My second primary source is this picture of a shawl from Islamic civilization. This shawl is made of silk with a golden fringe at the sides. As you can see the designs are very detailed. In each diamond, there is a vase filled with a bouquet of flowers with more flowers attached by a vine at the bottom. This piece of clothing is worn around the shoulders and is outlined with silk. There would be a detachable hood that connects to the two triangles. This would most likely be worn as a top layer over other layers of clothing.



Outline:
  • Each of their clothes were made of mostly silk
  • Both places wore many layer on their outfits
  • Both outlined with silk or gold
  • Each layer of both the Byzantine and Islam clothing would be detailed


Conclusion:
Even though there are many things different about Islams and Byzantines, clothing is not one of them. We have clearly seen many things that are alike from the examples of clothing from each empire.
          The architecture of the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Empire are diverse in many ways, due to the historical backgrounds from which they both came. The Hagia Sophia, constructed within the Byzantine Empire, and Dome of the Rock, constructed within the Islamic Empire, have such architectural similarities and differences because of the unique religious leaders that these empires were once ruled by.


Hagia Sophia:


          The Hagia Sophia, which means “Holy Wisdom”, was built in 537 under the rule of Justinian, is an icon of religious architecture within the Byzantine Empire. This church represents one of the many advancements that was inspired by early Christianity in the Byzantine Empire, also know as the “New Roman Empire”. The person credited with this installment of Christianity into the Byzantine Empire was Emperor Constantine, who ruled from 306 to 337. Being the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity, Constantine would later proclaim the Edict of Milan. This law would allow religious freedom throughout the Roman Empire, resulting in the rapid spread of Christianity. From this point in Byzantine history, almost all architecture within the empire would be dedicated to glorifying Christianity. This is the main reason that basilicas, large, gothic style churches, such as the Hagia Sophia, were built far larger than necessary. The impressive scale of these buildings was meant to lionize the new, spreading Christian religion. For example, the Hagia Sophia is 180 feet tall, and has the largest dome of its time, with a diameter of 31.5 meters. Robert L. Van Nice recorded within a journal called Hagia Sophia: New Types of Structural Evidence that the construction of this basilica is truly astounding. Van Nice says that the finishing of this project in under 6 years is what ranks it as one of the greatest architectural accomplishments in history. Van Nice also adds that Hagia Sophia’s ability to survive in such great condition, despite experiencing multiple earthquakes over the hundreds of years, is nothing short of architectural genius. He believes that the Hagia Sophia has definitely filled its role of being unmatched in size and stature by any other religious monument of its time.


Dome of the Rock:


          The Dome of the Rock, located in Jerusalem, is an excellent representative for the unique Islamic architecture. This mosque was built in 691 under the direction of Caliph Abd al-Malik, who was the ruler of the Umayyad Empire from . Alia F. Hasan expresses within his article, The Dome of the Rock: the Atypical Mosque, that al-Malik constructed this mosque to compete with the grand architecture of the Byzantine Empire. With the Byzantines being the current rivals of the Islamic Empire, Abd al-Malik was motivated to build this mosque to recognize the Islamic Empire’s power over the Byzantine Empire. Hasan concludes that al-Malik’s attempt to challenge the architecture of competing empires is the very reason that he chose to adopt some of the styles of the Byzantine architecture into Islamic architecture. Evidence of Abd al-Malik utilizing Byzantine architectural trends is shown in Dome of the Rock’s actual dome. Like Hagia Sophia’s large, centralized dome, the Dome of the Rock shares this characteristic. Other than the actual architecture of Dome of the Rock, the building’s artwork has little in common with that of Byzantine religious buildings. Within the Islamic religion, muslims are prohibited from recreating life, even in the form of artwork and drawings, as they believe that only Allah should be the creator of life. This is the reason that, within Islamic mosques, there are no mosaics that include drawings of important religious figures. Instead, beautiful designs and patterns are used to decorate the insides of most Islamic mosques. This is in complete contrast to the architecture of the era of early Christianity in the Byzantine Empire. Shown in the Hagia Sophia, images of Christ and other religious figures of Christianity are placed liberally throughout the church.


Paraphrase from Article about Hagia Sophia:

Robert L. Van Nice recorded within a journal called Hagia Sophia: New Types of Structural Evidence that the construction of this basilica is truly astounding. Van Nice says that the finishing of this project in under 6 years is what ranks it as one of the greatest architectural accomplishments in history. Van Nice also adds that Hagia Sophia’s ability to survive in such great condition, despite experiencing multiple earthquakes over the hundreds of years, is nothing short of architectural genius. He believes that the Hagia Sophia has definitely filled its role of being unmatched in size and stature by any other religious monument of its time.


Paraphrase from Article about Dome of the Rock:

Alia F. Hasan expresses within his article, The Dome of the Rock: the Atypical Mosque, that al-Malik constructed this mosque to compete with the grand architecture of the Byzantine Empire. With the Byzantines being the current rivals of the Islamic Empire, Abd al-Malik was motivated to build this mosque to recognize the Islamic Empire’s power over the Byzantine Empire. Hasan concludes that al-Malik’s attempt to challenge the architecture of competing empires is the very reason that he chose to adopt some of the styles of the Byzantine architecture into Islamic architecture.


Outline:

Byzantine Religious Architecture:
1.) Adoption of Christianity into Byzantine Empire is credited to Emperor Constantine
  A.) ruled from 306 to 337
  B.) proclaimed the Edict of Milan
     a.) he was the first Roman emperor to profess to Christianity
     b.) allowed religious freedom in Byzantine empire
     c.) caused a rapid spread of Christianity across empire
     d.) from this point onward, most architecture was dedicated to glorifying Christianity
2.) Hagia Sophia
  A.) Built with incredible speed for the time
     a.) completed in 5 years, 10 months
  B.) Largest church of its time
     a.) 180 feet tall
     b.) has a dome with diameter of 31.5 meters
     c.) has survived multiple earthquakes with little need of repair

Islam Religious Architecture:
1.) Caliph Abd al-Malik
  A.) was rivaled by the Byzantine Architecture
     a.) reason that he chose to  adopt Byzantine style of centralized dome
     b.) spent generous amounts of money to create Dome of the Rock
  B.) Byzantine Architecture was grand in scale to lionize Christianity
     a.) built mosque to celebrate the Muslim power over that of the Byzantines
  C.) Artwork within mosque
     a.) considered sacrilegious to “recreate” life
        i.) only Allah can create life
     b.) instead the builders painted beautiful designs
     c.) this is contrasting to Hagia Sophia

        i.) many paintings in Hagia Sophia of christ and other religious figures



Works Cited:

Alia F. Hasan, The Dome of the Rock: The Atypical Mosque. Suite101.com, 19 May 1999. Web. 13 Dec. 2013. >http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/arts/architec/MiddleAgesArchitectural/IslamicArchitecture/DomeoftheRock/DomeoftheRock.htm<


Anthony, Rashan, and William. Oracle Think Quest. Education Foundation, n.d. Web. 12 Dec. 2013. >http://library.thinkquest.org/C005594/Medieval/byzantine.html<

Owen Jarus. Hagia Sophia: Facts, History, and Architecture. Live Science, 1 Mar. 2013. Web. 15 Dec. 2013. >http://www.livescience.com/27574-hagia-sophia.html<

Richard Ettinghausen and Oleg Grabar. The Dome of the Rock. Yale University Press, n.d. Web. 15 Dec. 2013 >http://thehope.tripod.com/domerock.htm<

Islamic Mosques vs Byzantine Churches

The religious architecture of the Byzantine and Islamic empires symbolizes the vast differences of their religious cultures. Despite the fact that both religions are equally important to their civilizations, the Byzantine architecture is superior to that of Islam. I took a look at the religious architecture of each civilization, and I found that both the churches and mosques were equally extravagant in appearance but appeared to be vastly different in style.



Paraphrase 1:
 I chose to compare the Eastern Orthodox church of Hagia Sophia, and the Islamic mosque, Masjid al Haram.  As Lee Krystek explains in her writing of the Byzantine architecture, “Hagia Sophia: The Place of Holy Wisdom”, The Eastern Orthodox churches of the Byzantine Empire were very distinct with onion shaped domes set upon a rectangular base, which is a variation of the Roman way of setting domes on top of a circular base. The Hagia Sophia, after spending six years under construction, was reading for its final reveal in 537 AD.  The church was not an entirely new design. Many of the ideas that are utilized come from Rome, Greece, and Asia.  The large dome adorning the top of the church was the largest of its time and certainly a sight to see. It is flanked by half domes on both the western and eastern side of the church. On the four corners of the church, four spires rise out of the foundation, sticking up proudly for all to see for miles around. Various colors of bricks were utilized in such a way that they would create intricate designs on the outside of the building.  Justinian, who created a building plan specifically for the construction of buildings in his empire, ordered the finest materials from all over the world to construct his newest church.  The inside itself is extravagantly decorated with golden paintings on the ceiling and silk tapestries hanging above the main altar in the church. Like the brick on the outside, various amounts and colors of marble were used to create columns, pillars, the floor, and the ceiling.




Paraphrase 2: The Masjid al Haram is utilized in a very similar religious way, but the two structures, the church and mosque, are vastly different. Masjid al Haram was built under the rule of Caliph Omar Ibn al- Khattab in 634 AD .  According to “Visualizing the sites andmonuments of Islamic Pilgrimage” written by David J. Roxburgh , the Masjid al Haram is described clearly as “a perimeter constructed as a rectangle of porticoes of alternating red and black archways surrounded by domes and nineteen doors […]” The author is describing the breathtaking experience of stepping into the Grand Mosque in Mecca. The alternating colors of red and black archways lead visitors through the grand halls, nineteen named doors appearing at intervals along the porticoes winding around the perimeter of the building. The sacred black box, the Ka’ba, stands powerfully in the middle of the mess of archways, domes, and doors. The ka’ba is a solid black stone with a gold band that isn't easily looked over.  Around the box is a perfect circle for the practice of walking around the stone rectangle. The Ka’ba is a place of worship for every Muslim. Even if they are far from Mecca, the people of the religion turn towards this sacred box to pray during the day. Past this dark, obvious box are free standing figures that are most commonly associated with Abraham and “the schools of Islamic law”.



I.                    Even though both the Hagia Sophia and the Masjid al Haram are equally magnificent, the amount of detail that was incorporated into the Hagia Sophia gives it superiority over the mosque.
a.       The Hagia Sophia was also know by the name of the church of “Holy Wisdom
b.      The architecture was a blend of many other cultures, not just Byzantium ideas.
                                                               i.      Rome, Greece, and Asian countries influenced the architectural styles of the Hagia Sophia.
c.       The new dome shape was an advancement in the architecture of the Byzantine Empire.
                                                               i.      The onion shape of the dome was a distinct feature of this brilliant, church.
                                                             ii.      The Hagia Sophia is particular was set upon a rectangular base 200ft long and 220 ft wide.
1.       This new style of base was an attempt to stray away from the styles of Roman architecture with large, circular domes set upon a vaulted roof.
                                                            iii.      The massive dome of the Hagia Sophia was the largest dome constructed during that time period.
1.       It was over 100 feet from end to end.
a.       The dome was seen as so fantastic that it was often compared to Heaven itself.
                                                           iv.      The dome was supported on four sides by large columns. Without these, the dome would have collapsed, as it is not a freestanding structure.
                                                             v.      The east and west sides of the church were flanked by two identical half domes.
d.      On the northern and southern ends of the church were two arches that helped with the support of the large dome.
e.      The interior of the Hagia Sophia was adorned with paintings, marble, tapestries, and banners.
                                                               i.      Gold paintings were spread out amongst the ceilings of the church.
                                                             ii.      Marble of vast colors was used to create the walls, floors, and ceiling of the church, giving it an interesting look on the inside. It will never be described as plain.
f.        Procopius of Caesarea had visited the church after its completed and described the Hagia Sophia as, “distinguished by indescribable beauty, excelling both in its size, and in the harmony of its measures, having no part excessive and none deficient; being more magnificent than ordinary buildings, and much more elegant […] you would declare that the place is not lighted by the sun […] but that the rays are produced within itself […].”
g.       The mere sight of the Hagia Sophia is enough to take anyone’s breath away. As the church is approached, the intricate detail becomes prominent to the observant eye, and the immense amount of work is seen.



II.                  Although just as stunning as the Hagia Sophia, the detail of the Masjid al Haram is unable to live up to that of the massive church.
a.       The Ka’ba is located in the middle of the Masjidal Haram
                                                               i.      The Ka’ba is the most sacred building in Islam.
                                                             ii.      It is a small, rectangular, black box standing at an approximate height of 50 ft.
                                                            iii.      Every day, five times, the people who practice Islam will turn towards the Ka’ba, despite how far away they may be, and pray to it.
b.      Like the Hagia Sophia, the architecture ideas come from the ideas of other cultures.
                                                               i.      The style of building is roughly based on the ideas of Rome, the Byzantine Empire, and Persia.
1.       The conquering of Persia directly influenced a change in the architectural styles, especially religious, of the Islamic culture.
2.       The culture adapted the arch styles of both the Romans and the Byzantine Empire.
3.       As a result of all of these adaptations, the architecture of the Islamic community was extremely influenced by Rome and the Byzantine Empire.
c.       Arabesque is most commonly seen adorning the walls of mosques.
                                                               i.      Arabesque is an art form that consists of repeated geometric patterns that often represent plants.
                                                             ii.      Painting a human was considered wrong in Islamic religion, therefore it was forbidden to do so.
d.      The Masjid al Haram has been dubbed with multiple other names such as “The Grand Mosque” or “The Forbiden Mosque”. 
e.      Red and black are a common color is the Grand Mosque.
                                                               i.      Archways, which are spread out amongst the mosque, in particular were colored in these two colors.
f.        The beauty of the Masjid al Haram in Mecca should never be overlooked, and should be respected by people of all cultures, but the amount of detail that was put into this building does not live up to that of the Hagia Sophia.


Despite the fact that both buildings are beautiful and unique to the individual cultures of the countries that they reside in, the Hagia Sophia’s plan of architecture is vastly different and more unique than that of the Masjid al Haram. The Masjid al Haram is a very open floor plan, with various arches and little to no actual color. On the other hand, the Hagia Sophia is brilliantly decorated with mosaics and tapestries hanging all around the interior of this church. When going into the detail of the vast cultures, it is obvious that more detail was put into the Byzantine architecture.

Sources:
Black, Linda, Larry S. Krieger, Phillip C. Naylor, and Dahia Ibo Shabaka. "The Muslim World, The Byzantine Empire." World History Patterns of Interactions. By Roger B. Beck. N.p.: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012. 273+. Print. 

Islamic and Byzantine coins

Bubba Joiner
12/18/13
Block A

There are many differences in coins from the Islamic and Byzantine empires.  The biggest difference is their looks.  Islamic and Byzantine coins look nothing alike.  Islam coins had verses on their faces.  Also the Quran encourages trade.  Byzantine coins had emperor’s hl faces on them.

The Islamic coins had verses from the Quran on them, the verse says that the only God is God and that Muhammad is the prophet. Verses in the Quran in section 004.029 that actually encourage trade.  The currency in the Islamic empire is called Dinar and is made of gold.  They had coin weights hl that were made of glass.  They were about the same weight as the average Dinar and were clearly marked as weights.



Byzantine coins had the emperor’s face hl, regalia, and symbols of Christ on them. Among these symbols were crowns, crosses, and angels.  Some coins even had the emperor’s portrait on them.






Islamic and Byzantine coins have very different symbols on them.  Each symbol means something different and connects to the culture of the time period.  

I.  Introduction
    A.  There are many differences in coins from the Islamic and Byzantine empires.
    B.  Thesis: Islamic and Byzantine coins look nothing alike
    C.  Basic comparison

II.   Body Paragraphs
      A.  In depth description of Islamic coin
            i.  verse from Quran
           ii.  Quran encourages trade
          iii.  glass weight
      B.  In depth description of Byzantine coin
            i.  symbols on coins

III.  Conclusion



Works Cited:

Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. "Solidus [Early Byzantine]." The Metropolitan
    Museum of Art. N.p., May 2012. Web. <http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/
    works-of-art/04.35.3356>.

Durkee, Joseph H. "Gold Solidus of Justinian I (527–65)." The Metropolitan
    Museum of Art. N.p., 1898. Web. <http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/

    search-the-collections/469160>.

"Gold Solidus of Justinian I (527–65)." The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
    N.p., 1898. Web. <http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/
    search-the-collections/469160?img=1>.

Fund, Rogers. "Coin Weight." The Metropolitan Museum of Art. N.p., 1908. Web.
    <http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/453506>.



"Gold [Syria]" (99.35.2386) In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History . New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/99.35.2386. (May 2012)
Jacob Laney
History
Mr. Ward
12/18/13

Contrast of Jesus of Nazareth in the Qur’an and the Bible


            Jesus of Nazareth is a prevalent figure in the major religions of the Byzantine and Islamic empire, which are Christianity and Islam. Both religions consider Jesus a holy figure and both believe he performed miracles while on earth. Though both view him as a holy figure their views are very different from there. The Qur’an and the Bible state how they view him many time within their texts.
            In the Qur’an Jesus of Nazareth is a holy figure. Muslims love, honor, and believe in Jesus. Jesus in not a divinity in the Muslim faith. The Qur’an states Jesus was born of a virgin and performed miracles on earth. In Muslim culture they believe Jesus spoke as a baby. Jesus was said to have performed five miracle in the Qur’an while on earth. The miracles he performed on earth were not to show that he was god but that he was backed by god. Jesus was a prophet in the Qur’an who got his power from god. In the Qur’an it is said that Jesus was not crucified but ascended into heaven without dying. Jesus is comparable to Isaiah or any other major prophet in the Bible.
            In the Bible Jesus of Nazareth is seen as a holy figure. Jesus is the center of the Christian faith. Jesus is seen as a divinity in the Christian faith. In the bible it is said that Jesus was born of a virgin and performed miracles on earth. In the Bible Jesus is said to have performed a multitude of miracles while on earth. In the New Testament Jesus goes through five major stages. The stages are the baptism, transfiguration, crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension into heaven. In the Bible Jesus is said to have been crucified and died and then he rose again to ascend to heaven after death and resurrection. The miracles that he perform on earth were to show that he was god. In the Bible Jesus is seen as part of god or one the “holy trinity.”

Outline
I.                    Jesus in the Qur’an
a.      Born of a virgin
b.      Performed five miracles while on earth
1.      Spoke as a baby
2.      Healed the blind
3.      Healed lepers
4.      Revive the dead
5.      Breathed life into a clay bird
c.       Not a divinity
d.      A prophet of god
e.      Ascended without dying
II.                  Jesus in the Bible
a.      Born of a virgin
b.      Performed many miracles
c.       A divinity
d.      He is god
1.      Part of a “holy trinity” which makes up god
e.      Ascended after dying
1.      Crucified
2.      Dead for three days
3.      Rose again and ascended

Works Cited
Ganeri, Anita. The Quran. London: Evans, 2002. Print.
Hooke, S. H. The Bible in Basic English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1982. Print.
"Jesus in the Quran." Jesus in the Quran. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. <http://www.letusreason.org/islam11.htm>.

"Jesus." Who Is ? N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. <http://carm.org/dictionary-jesus>

Comparison Between the Treatment of Foreign Cultures Within the Byzantine and Islamic Empire

Comparison Between the Treatment of Foreign Cultures Within the Byzantine and Islamic Empire

Eastern Europe was a very important place after the fall of the Roman Empire. The Byzantine Empire was all that remained slightly Roman, but the idea of the Roman Culture slowly fell away from them as Greek became the language of state officials and the Greek Cultures collided with the remnants of the Roman. Over time, the Byzantine Empire was considered completely Greek. However, to the south, the Islamic Empire finally united under one leader who was known as the Caliph. This empire wasn't Christian like the Byzantine Empire, they followed the teaching of Islam, as the empires were so close to each other, this created a strong conflict of religion. The Islamic people were very tolerant of other Religions, while the Byzantines wanted everybody in their empire to be Christian, evident when they exiled the Jews because of their defiance. To themselves, each different party thought that their way was right, but which was ideal for the people living under such a rule?



Byzantine Empire
The Byzantines were extremely strict on what they wanted their people to worship. For the largest amount of time, the Byzantines were Christians who still had loyalties to the Pope, back in Rome. In the Tenth Century, the Jewish people were exiled fro
Painting of the Iconoclasm
m the entire empire, and had to fend for themselves. This was mostly because of the Arabic pressure in the east, but this does show what the Byzantines think of foreign religion or culture. The Byzantines also ordered the destruction of icons throughout the empire, icons of different religions and even Christianity. They felt the icon wrongly created a sense of hubris. The Byzantines wanted religious unification, which looked very good to the Pope, and other Christians in the west. Both of the different empires had steps and rules about how they would treat different religions or cultures, but which one would be the best for the people themselves?

Islamic Empire
Islamic Durham

The Islamic Empire had a special tax for people who didn't follow the state religion. This was known as the Jizya Tax, and it was based upon your social class and personal wealth. Written in Aurangzeb's Fatwa on Jizya, it was recorded that Wealthier people had to pay 4 Durhams a month, which costed them 48 Durhams a year. Citizens in the middle of the scale had to pay 2 Durhams a month, which adds up to 24 Durhams a year, and the employed poor were required to pay 1 Durham a month. People who are without a job, disabled, blind, or ill are not required to pay the Jizya Tax.  However, this tax had another motive, other than making money. Having to pay the tax every month would lessen the amount of money a person could save, so over time it can cause people to convert to Islam, so they can save money. It seems like a win-win situation for the Muslims, either they gave them a large sum of money, or they would convert to their religion. Compared to the Byzantines, the Muslims had a largely different approach on the issue of cultures colliding.




Outline


Byzantine Empire
            1. Exiled different religious or cultural groups
            2. Began the Iconoclasm, the removal of all religious icons from their culture
            3. Constantly warred with the Muslims over religion
            4. Not very tolerant of any non-Christian culture or religion

Islamic Empire

            1. Began the Jizya Tax, taxing people in their realm who did not follow Islam
            2. Taxed people evenly based on income and wealth
            3. Refrained from taxing people incapable of maintaining a stable source of income, or                   the sick
            4. Extremely tolerant of other religions or cultures

Similarities

            1. Both religions did what was socially acceptable, to their own respective cultures
            2. Both Empires try to promote their religion to others in the best of their ability





Sources


Primary Sources:

Islam: "Manas: History and Politics, Aurangzeb." Aurangzeb's Fatwa on Jizya. N.p., 17 July 2006. Web. 11 Dec. 2013. <http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Mughals/Aurnag_fatwa.html>.
Byzantine: "Byzantine and Islam Tension and Conflict." Ancient History: ABC- Clio. N.p., 24 Feb. 2005. Web. 11 Dec. 2013. <http://ancienthistory.abc-clio.com/Topics/Display/1185300?cid=41&terms=Islam>.

Secondary Sources:
Angelov, Dimiter (2007). Imperial Ideology and Political Thought in Byzantium (1204–1330). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Web
"The Islamic World, 600–1500 CE." ABC-Clio. N.p., 12 Mar. 2007. Web. 18 Dec. 2013. <http://ancienthistory.abcclio.com/Search/Display/588504?terms=Islamic Empire>.